| 
							
      					 | 
  					 
  					
    					 | 
   					 
   										
    					| Gemcitabine-based combination therapy compared with gemcitabine alone for advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials | 
  					 
  					  										
						| Shui-Fang Jin, Zhao-Kun Fan, Lei Pan and Li-Ming Jin | 
					 
															
						Hangzhou, China 
 
Author Affiliations: Intensive Care Unit (Jin SF and Fan ZK) and Department of Oncology (Pan L), First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310006, China; Department of General Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China (Jin LM) 
Corresponding Author: Li-Ming Jin, MD, Department of General Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China (Tel: +86-571-85893418; Email: hz_jlm@163.com) | 
					 
										
						 | 
					 
				 
				
				
					
						
							
								
									
										
											
                        					 
												
													
													    | 
													    	
														 | 
													 
																										
													
														
															
													
													    
													     		                            						                            																	    Abstract  BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies and chemotherapy is an effective strategy for advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine (GEM) is one of first-line agents. However, GEM-based combination therapy has shown promising efficacy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of GEM-based combination therapy versus GEM alone in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. 
DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of literature was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A quantitative meta-analysis was performed based on the inclusion criteria from all eligible randomized controlled trials. The outcome indicators included overall survival (OS), 6-month survival, 1-year survival, progression-free survival/time-to-progression (PFS/TTP), and toxicities. 
RESULTS: A total of nine randomized controlled trials involving 1661 patients were included in this meta-analysis. There was significant improvement in the GEM-based combination therapy with regard to the OS (HR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.95, P=0.003), PFS (HR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.65-0.90, P=0.002), 6-month survival (RR=1.09, 95% CI: 1.01-1.17, P=0.03), and the overall toxicity (RR=1.68, 95% CI: 1.52-1.86, P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the 1-year survival. 
CONCLUSIONS: GEM-based combination chemotherapy might improve the OS, 6-month survival, and PFS in advanced pancreatic cancer. However, combined therapy also added toxicity.
																										     | 
														 
														
														
															| 
															    															    															    															 | 
														 
														 																											    																														 
															 | 
															
																
															 | 
													    	
															 | 
																
															
														 
														
													 
													
												 
												
												
												
											
											 
											
											 
										 
									 | 
								 
							 
						 | 
					 
				 
			
		 |