| 
							
      					 | 
  					 
  					
    					 | 
   					 
   										
    					| Histopathological findings in cholecystectomies specimens: A single institution study of 20,584 cases | 
  					 
  					  										
						| Slim Charfia , b , *, Naourez Gouiaa a , b , Hela Mnif a , b , Lassaad Chtourou b , c , Nabil Tahri b , c , Bassem Abid b , d , Rafik Mzali b , d , Tahya Sellami Boudawara a , b | 
					 
															
						a Department of Pathology, CHU Habib Bourguiba, Sfax 3029, Tunisia 
b Sfax Medical School, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia 
c Department of Gastroenterology, CHU Habib Bourguiba, Sfax 3029, Tunisia 
d Department of Surgery, CHU Habib Bourguiba, Sfax 3029, Tunisia 
∗ Corresponding author. 
E-mail address: charfislim@gmail.com (S. Charfi). | 
					 
										
						 | 
					 
				 
				
				
					
						
							
								
									
										
											
                        					 
												
													
													    | 
													    	
														 | 
													 
																										
													
														
															
													
													    | 
													     		                            						                            																	    Abstract   BACKGROUND: 
The histopathological examination of cholecystectomy specimens has not been standardized with a debate concerning the routine and the selective approach. The aim of this study was to assess the information obtained from routine histopathological examination of cholecystectomy specimens. 
METHODS: 
All histopathological reports of cholecystectomy specimens between January 2003 and December 2016 were analyzed, including a clinical diagnosis of benign gallstone disease or cholecystitis. 
RESULTS: 
A total of 20,584 reports were examined. The mean age of patients was 54.2 years. Patients aged more than 60 years represent 37.6% of the study population. Of all patients, 15,973 (77.6%) were females. Incidental gallbladder cancers (GBC) were present in 155 cholecystectomies specimens (0.8%). 67.1% of GBC are at T2 and T3 stage. Granulomatous cholecystitis was diagnosed in only 19 cases (0.1%). GBC were more prevalent in older patients (P < 10-6) and cholesterolosis was more prevalent in young patients (P < 10-6). There was no gender predilection for GBC (P = 0.739). 
CONCLUSIONS: 
The rate of incidental gallbladder carcinoma in our study is low, yet, we found a higher proportion of T2 and T3 carcinomas stage. Granulomatous cholecystitis may need further investigations and treatments. When a selective approch of histopathological examination of cholecystectomy specimens is used, it is important to take into account that clinical parameters are significantly associated with gallbladder cancer. 
																										     | 
														 
														
														
															| 
															    															    															    															 | 
														 
														 																											    																														 
															 | 
															
																
															 | 
													    	
															 | 
																
															
														 
														
													 
													
												 
												
												
												
											
											 
											
											 
										 
									 | 
								 
							 
						 | 
					 
				 
			
		 |