|
|
|
| Liver transplantation as an alternative for the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastasis: Appraisal of the current evidence |
| Philip C. Muller, Matthias Pfister, Dilmurodjon Eshmuminov, Kuno Lehmann ∗ |
Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, Zurich CH-8091, Switzerland
∗Corresponding author.
E-mail address: kuno.lehmann@usz.ch (K. Lehmann). |
|
|
|
Abstract Background: Liver transplantation (LT) for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) is still in debate. Studies comparing LT with liver resection (LR) for NELM are scarce, as patient selection is heterogeneous and experience is limited. The goal of this review was to provide a critical analysis of the evidence on LT versus LR in the treatment of NELM.
Data sources: A scoping literature search on LT and LR for NELM was performed with PubMed, including English articles up to March 2023.
Results: International guidelines recommend LR for NELM in resectable, well-differentiated tumors in the absence of extrahepatic metastatic disease with superior results of LR compared to systemic or liver-directed therapies. Advanced liver surgery has extended resectability criteria whilst entailing increased perioperative risk and short disease-free survival. In highly selected patients (based on the Milan criteria) with unresectable NELM, oncologic results of LT are promising. Prognostic factors include tumor biology (G1/G2) and burden, waiting time for LT, patient age and extrahepatic spread. Based on low-level evidence, LT for low-grade NELM within the Milan criteria resulted in improved disease-free survival and overall survival compared to LR. The benefits of LT were lost in patients beyond the Milan NELM-criteria.
Conclusions: With adherence to strict selection criteria especially tumor biology, LT for NELM is becoming a valuable option providing oncologic benefits compared to LR. Recent evidence suggests even stricter selection criteria with regard to tumor biology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 23 
