|
|
Liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma |
Amilcare Parisi, Jacopo Desiderio, Stefano Trastulli, Elisa Castellani, Rosario Pasquale, Roberto Cirocchi, Carlo Boselli and Giuseppe Noya |
Terni, Italy
Author Affiliations: Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, St. Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy (Parisi A, Desiderio J, Trastulli S and Pasquale R); Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, University of Perugia, St. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy (Castellani E, Boselli C and Noya G); Department of General and Urgent Surgery, University of Perugia, Terni, Italy (Cirocchi R)
Corresponding Author: Jacopo Desiderio, MD, Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Unit, St. Maria Hospital, Via Tristano di Joannuccio 1, Terni 05100, Italy (Email: djdesi85@hotmail.it) |
|
|
Abstract BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common type of primary liver tumor and its incidence is increasing worldwide. The study aimed to compare patients subjected to liver resection or radiofrequency ablation.
METHODS: One hundred and forty cirrhotic patients in stage A or B of Child-Pugh with single nodular or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 87 underwent surgical resection, and 53 underwent percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Patient charac-teristics, survival, and recurrence-free survival were analyzed.
RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival was longer in the resection group in comparison to the radiofrequency group with a median recurrence-free time of 36 versus 26 months, respectively (P=0.01, HR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.05-2.25). In the resection group, median survival was 46 months, with the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 89.7%, 72.4% and 40.2%. In the radiofrequency group, median survival was 32 months, with the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 83.0%, 43.4% and 22.6% (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection improves the overall survival and recurrence-free survival in comparison with radiofrequency ablation. New evidences are needed to define the real role of the percutaneous technique as an alternative to surgery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|