|
|
|
| Risk assessment in patients undergoing liver resection |
| De-Cai Yu, Wei-Bo Chen, Chun-Ping Jiang and Yi-Tao Ding |
Nanjing, China
Author Affiliations: Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Medical School of Nanjing University (Yu DC, Jiang CP and Ding YT); Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nanjing University (Yu DC, Chen WB, Jiang CP and Ding YT), Nanjing 210008, China
Corresponding Author: Yi-Tao Ding, MD, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Medical School of Nanjing University; Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China (Tel: 86-25-83304616; Fax: 86-25-83317016; Email: drdingyitao@sina.com) |
|
|
|
|
Abstract BACKGROUND: Liver resection is still a risky procedure with high morbidity and mortality. It is significant to predict the morbidity and mortality with some models after liver resection.
DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases were searched using the terms "hepatectomy" and "risk assessment" for relevant studies before August 2012. Papers published in English were included.
RESULTS: Thirty-four original papers were included finally. Some models, such as MELD, APACHE II, E-PASS, or POSSUM, widely used in other populations, are useful to predict the morbidity and mortality after liver resection. Some special models for liver resection are used to predict outcomes after liver resection, such as mortality, liver dysfunction, transfusion, or acute renal failure. However, there is no good scoring system to predict or classify surgical complications because of shortage of internal or external validation.
CONCLUSION: It is important to validate the models for the major complications after liver resection with further internal or external databases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013, Vol. 12 
