|
|
|
| Safety and efficacy of transpapillary bridged bilateral side-by-side stenting for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction |
| Hirotsugu Maruyama, Kazunari Tominaga, Kunihiro Kato, Satoshi Sugimori, Masatsugu Shiba, Toshio Watanabe and Yasuhiro Fujiwara |
Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3, Asahimachi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan (Maruyama H, Tominaga K, Kato K, Sugimori S, Shiba M, Watanabe T and Fujiwara Y)
Corresponding Author: Kazunari Tominaga
(Email: tomy@med.osaka-cu.ac.jp) |
|
|
|
| Guide |
|
Abstract To the Editor:
Biliary drainage is most frequently performed among endoscopic procedures using pancreatobiliary endoscopy. A large-diameter metallic stent can significantly extend the patency period rather than a plastic stent for extrahepatic biliary stricture.[1] However, the optimal drainage for the hilar biliary obstruction is still controversial. Various techniques have been attempted for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction.[2] There are also some controversies regarding unilateral versus bilateral liver drainage.[3, 4] Recent studies have reported that at least 50% drainage of liver volume achieves sufficient efficacy or longer survival in patients with malignant hilar obstruction.[3, 5] Therefore, multiple kinds of endoscopic placements of self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) may be required. However, despite recent innovations in endoscopic technology, bilateral SEMS placement may be difficult and challenging. As the reasons, insert a second stent through tight stricture, adjustment of the lower end of the SEMSs, and re-intervention under fluoroscopy are difficult associated with bilateral side-by-side stenting.
|
|
|
|
|
| Fund: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017, Vol. 16 
