|
|
|
| Small-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation: Definition, pathophysiology and management |
| Yuichi Masuda ∗, Kazuki Yoshizawa , Yasunari Ohno , Atsuyoshi Mita , Akira Shimizu , Yuji Soejima |
Division of Gastroenterological, Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
∗ Corresponding author.
E-mail address: masuda@shinshu-u.ac.jp (Y. Masuda). |
|
|
|
Abstract Background: Since the first success in an adult patient, living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has be- come an universally used procedure. Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) is a well-known complication after partial LT, especially in cases of adult-to-adult LDLT. The definition of SFSS slightly varies among trans- plant physicians. The use of a partial liver graft has risks of SFSS development. Persistent portal vein (PV) hypertension and PV hyper-perfusion after LT were identified as the main factors. Hence, various approaches were explored to modulate PV flow and decrease PV pressure in order to alleviate this syn- drome. Herein, the definition, clinical symptoms, pathophysiology, basic research, as well as preventive and treatment strategies for SFSS are reviewed based on an extensive review of the literature and on our own experiences.
Data sources: The articles were collected through PubMed using search terms “liver transplantation”, “living donor liver transplantation”, “living liver donation”, “partial graft”, “small-for-size graft”, “small-for- size syndrome”, “graft volume”, “remnant liver”, “standard liver volume”, “graft to recipient body weight ratio”, “sarcopenia”, “porcine”, “swine”, and “rat”. English publications published before March 31, 2020 were included in this review.
Results: Many transplant surgeons performed PV flow modulation, including portocaval shunt, splenic artery ligation and splenectomy. With these techniques, patient outcome has been improved even when using a "small" graft. Other factors, such as preoperative recipients’ nutritional and skeletal muscle status, graft congestion, and donor factors, were also identified as risk factors which all have been addressed using various strategies.
Conclusions: The surgical approach controlling PV flow and pressure could help to prevent SFSS especially in severely ill recipients. In the absence of efficacious medications to resolve SFSS, conservative treatments, including aggressive fluid balance correction for massive ascites, anti-microbiological therapy to prevent or control sepsis and intensive nutritional therapy, are all required if SFSS could not be prevented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 19 
