|
|
Relief of jaundice in malignant biliary obstruction: When should we consider endoscopic ultrasonography-guided hepaticogastrostomy as an option? |
Alessandro Fugazza a , ∗, Matteo Colombo a , b , Marco Spadaccini a , b , Edoardo Vespa a , b , Roberto Gabbiadini a , b , Antonio Capogreco a , b , Alessandro Repici a , b , Andrea Anderloni a |
a Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
b Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
∗ Corresponding author.
E-mail address: alessandro.fugazza@humanitas.it (A. Fugazza). |
|
|
Abstract Background: Since it was first described in 2001, endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as an alternative procedure for achieving an endoscopic internal drainage in case of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failure. Biliary drainage can be achieved by ei- ther a transduodenal extrahepatic approach through EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS), or a transgastric intrahepatic approach, namely EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) which already holds a remarkable place in the treatment of patients with malignant biliary obstruction.
Data sources: For this review we did a comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE from inception to May 31, 2021 for papers with a significant sample size (at least 20 patients enrolled) dealing with EUS-HGS. Data on technical success, clinical success and rate of adverse events were collected.
Results: A total of 22 studies with different design, com prising 874 patients, were included. Technical success was achieved in about 96% of cases (ranging from 65% to 100%). Clinical success was obtained in almost 91% of cases (ranging from 76% to 100%). Overall rate of adverse events was 19% (ranging from 0% to 35%). Abdominal pain, self-limiting pneumoperitoneum, bile leak, cholangitis, bleeding, perforation and intraperitoneal migration of the stent were the most common.
Conclusions: Despite both safety and efficacy profile, at the moment HGS still remains a challenging procedure at every single step and must therefore be conducted by a very experienced endoscopist in interventional EUS and ERCP procedures, who is able to deal with the possible severe adverse events of this procedure. A rapid introduction in clinical practice of dedicated devices is desiderable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|